Removed

[Manawydn]

...

2. Small fighters can hold way too many advanced satellites (50) considering the size of the wares needed to make advanced satellites. 50 advanced satellites requires 250 advanced electronics, 250 scanning arrays, and 500 energy cells. That's never gonna fit in a small fighter, that is what a freighter with a large cargo capacity can accommodate. Having ships that hold this many advanced satellites make satellite trading that much easier.

You are definitely right about this. The ship stats are so nonsensical and have been since release, way back in 2018. Small fighters hold 50 sattellites etc. while they should barely fit one. Destroyers and large miners somehow hold 40 small ships?! but 10 drones at most??? Destroyers should use the cargo space for missiles instead. For carriers it is the opposite: They should be able to hold more fighters than destroyers and miners. So all ships should either be rebalanced or redesigned to visually make sense with these numbers.

Or Egosoft can go the lazy route and retcon "Magic dimensional Harry Potter bags" into X-lore...Seriously, don't do that please.

Off-topic: copy-paste turret stats across the board. Especially bad for Terrans, who are supposed to have been isolationalits. Instead they ape after other lesser factions and races while still lacking weapon types instead...

You are 100% correct, and to extrapolate - Placeholder values are not good, fun, immersive, or healthy for the game.

Or Egosoft can go the lazy route and retcon "Magic dimensional Harry Potter bags" into X-lore...Seriously, don't do that please...

You've obviously never played any of the games up to and including the X3's. There was this thing called 'cargo bay compression' that allowed players to add massive amounts of cargo space to their ships, at a price. That's your "Magic dimensional Harry Potter bags" already in X-Universe lore.

As a moderator, you shouldn't be getting all defensive and snarky like you have been recently. It drives away the playerbase. Stop trying to "win" arguments, get your head out of your emotions.

Previous X-games are not exactly role-models for "good balance". It's like saying that "Polititian A did it so we can too." There is no reason behind your statements, only appeals to "the lulz" You clearly need better media-presence training. Doesn't feel so good when the passive agressive borderline insults are hurled your way not does it?

I can't believe I feel the need to say this, but @CBJ please close this topic or reign in your moderator.

[CBJ]

You need to stop trying to tell moderators what to do. The forum rules are quite clear about discussion of moderator actions.